Now the print preview is displayed, to print this view, please use the print button of your browser, else return to the website view.

Home > Conventional methods

Print | Forward page

Conventional methods

The alternatives to implants are fixed dentures (bridge) and removable dentures (partial* or full prosthesis**).

Smaller gaps of missing teeth are usually treated with bridge restorations, while larger gaps are restored with partial prostheses and a completely toothless jaw is treated with a full prosthesis.

These solutions have a few advantages but they also have important disadvantages.

*Partial denture (conventional):
Larger gaps between the teeth can be bridged with partial prostheses. The denture is secured to the remaining teeth with clasps or other retainers. This variant is economical but does not usually provide an esthetically satisfactory result and can lead to problems with oral hygiene. In addition, the teeth used for securing the clasps can be loosened by poor loading. This can even lead to these teeth being lost too.

**Full denture (conventional):
Full dentures are used to provide people who have no teeth with a functional set of teeth. With this solution, the new teeth are affixed to a gum-colored acrylic base. In the upper jaw, these restorations are held in place by suction. The sensation of taste can be greatly impaired because the palate is covered by the denture. A substantial jaw ridge helps to hold full dentures in place. However, with the absence of a tooth root, there are no bite forces transferred to the bone, causing it to atrophy and deteriorating the fit of the denture.